SERGEI SERGEIEVICH PROKOFIEV
BORN: April 23, 1891. Sontsovka in the Ekaterina district of Ukraine
DIED: March 5, 1953. Nikolina Gora, near Moscow
COMPOSED: He began a Concertino for Violin in 1915, soon abandoned the project to concentrate on his Dostoyevsky opera The Gambler, and returned to what became his Violin Concerto No. 1 in the summer of 1917
WORLD PREMIERE: October 18, 1923, at one of the Concerts Koussevitzky in Paris, with Marcel Darrieux as soloist and Serge Koussevitzky as conductor
US PREMIERE: April 24, 1925. The soloist was Richard Burgin, and the Boston Symphony was led by Koussevitzky
SFS PERFORMANCES: FIRST—March 1939. Concertmaster Naoum Blinder was soloist under Pierre Monteux's direction. MOST RECENT—March 2014. Julia Fischer was soloist, with Michael Tilson Thomas conducting
INSTRUMENTATION: 2 flutes (2nd doubling piccolo), 2 oboes, 2 clarinets, 2 bassoons, 4 horns, 2 trumpets, tuba, timpani, tambourine, military drum, harp, and strings
DURATION: About 22 mins
THE BACKSTORY The year 1917 could not have been an easy one for a Russian composer to concentrate on his work. A series of strikes, antiwar marches, and the refusal of soldiers to fire on the demonstrators led, step by step, to revolution and the abdication of the Tsar; Lenin arrived at Petrograd's Finland Station after ten years of exile; the Black Sea fleet mutinied; there were terrible food shortages in the big cities; the Kerensky government was overthrown in the October Revolution (which actually took place on November 7 according to the Western European calendar) and Lenin became Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars; and an armistice with Germany was signed at Brest-Litovsk. Nonetheless, for Prokofiev 1917 was the most richly productive year of his life, the one in which he composed not only the Classical Symphony, but the Violin Concerto No. 1, the Third and Fourth Piano Sonatas, the Visions fugitives for piano, and in which he began the ambitious and in many ways remarkable cantata on Chaldean texts, Seven, They Are Seven as well as his Piano Concerto No. 3. By the time he left the Saint Petersburg Conservatory, Prokofiev had consolidated his friendship with Serge Koussevitzky, who had already led the premiere of the Piano Concerto No. 1 and who was to become not only Prokofiev's most devoted and effective advocate as a conductor, first in Russia, then in Western Europe, and finally in America, but also his first publisher.
Prospects in Russia did not, however, look promising to Prokofiev, and in March 1918, having persuaded Koussevitzky to give him a substantial advance, raising some more money through concerts (he conducted the premiere of the Classical Symphony at one of these), and having talked an official into issuing a passport with no expiration date, he took off for America. He did it by heading East, via Trans‑Siberian Railway to Vladivostok, then by ship to Tokyo, where he gave some concerts, and finally across the Pacific. Thus the first of his seven visits to the United States began in San Francisco, and his first view of this continent was of the still unbridged Golden Gate.
The immigration authorities, taking him for a Bolshevik spy, did not treat him kindly, and, with few dollars but carrying a hefty package of scores including the still unheard Violin Concerto, he got on a train to New York as soon as he could. There he gave a piano recital that gave him a reputation as a sort of musical fauve, a wild man, and he recorded a few piano rolls. At a concert in Petrograd, Prokofiev had once met Cyrus McCormick, President of the International Harvester Company (his father had invented the first mechanical reaper). Prokofiev liked machines and McCormick, who liked modern music, had given the young composer his card and with expansive American bonhomie had said "Look me up if you're ever in Chicago." On that basis, Prokofiev took off for the Midwest, where his luck began to improve. Frederick Stock programmed the Scythian Suite with the Chicago Symphony and the Opera undertook to produce The Love for Three Oranges whose march would years later become the theme music for the radio crime drama The FBI in Peace and War.
Prokofiev continued to compose, conduct, and play the piano, the latter two with mixed reactions from critics and audiences. He fell in love with, lived with, and eventually married Carlina Codina, a soprano with a Spanish father and an Alsatian-Polish mother and who sang under the name of Lina Llubera. He crossed the Atlantic several times, tried living in Bavaria, and at last, in the early fall of 1923, settled in Paris. There we find him once again taking up the connection with Koussevitzky, and poised for the belated premiere of the Violin Concerto No. 1. It was not a great success. First of all, it had been difficult to find a soloist. Back in 1917 the plan had been for that superb Polish violinist, Paweł Kochański, then teaching in Petrograd, to give the premiere, but by 1923 he and Prokofiev had lost touch. Milstein was still in Russia. Huberman refused even to look at the score. Darrieux, Koussevitzky's Paris concertmaster, was a solid musician and an able violinist, but he lacked the spark to make a convincing case for the piece in its premiere. Its real career began the following year, when Joseph Szigeti played it in Prague with Fritz Reiner, and that incomparable Hungarian artist subsequently carried it all over Europe and America, was the first violinist to play it with orchestra in the Soviet Union, and was politely persistent with English Columbia executives until they allowed him to make the first recording of it with Sir Thomas Beecham in 1935.
But even beyond whatever hindrance to acceptance the Darrieux/Koussevitzky performance might have created, the work itself was not likely to please musical tout Paris just then. Audiences there, and particularly those for the Concerts Koussevitzky, wanted their modern music to carry a certain shock value. (The failure ten years earlier of Le Sacre du printemps is a famous moment in Parisian musical history, but that was a dance failure, not a music failure; the first concert performance of Sacre under Monteux was a huge success.) Though Paris welcomed the Prokofiev of the spiky ballet score The Buffoon and the savage Scythian Suite, the latter, let's face it, quite a successful go at capitalizing on the Sacre sensation, the Violin Concerto was simply too Romantic. The composer Georges Auric brought out the most wounding adjective in his vocabulary—Mendelssohnian. Ironically and not altogether surprisingly, Prokofiev had the opposite experience when he returned to Russia for the first time. There, people loved the Violin Concerto, but The Buffoon and the Scythian Suite did not please.
THE MUSIC Prokofiev himself recognized in his life work four “basic lines," which he called classical, modern, motoric, and lyrical. These do not, however, correspond to particular periods in his life. All are present all the time, in different balances of course, and the Violin Concerto No. 1 exemplifies this. Prokofiev remarks that his "lyric line"—and he cites the opening of the First Violin Concerto as an instance—was “not noticed until late. For a long time I was given no credit for any lyric gift whatever, and for want of encouragement it developed slowly. But as time went on I gave more and more attention to this aspect of my work." What the violin plays in the first moments of this concerto is ravishing lyric invention indeed, rhythmically afloat, unpredictable in its unfolding. Sognando—"dreaming"—is the direction in the violin part. The melody is also beautifully accompanied by a soft aureole of string sound to which are added a few shy offers to inject a little counterpoint.
A second theme over a stubborn cello figure is different in every respect—key (C rather than D), meter (4/4 instead of 6/8) and atmosphere. Now the instruction to the violinist is narrante. David Oistrakh recounted that Prokofiev had said of this section, "Play it as though you're trying to convince someone of something." (Oistrakh had first played the concerto to Prokofiev, as a boy in Odessa, and was publicly shamed by being told he was doing it all wrong, but he became one of its splendid exponents, immensely admired by the composer.) The music gathers momentum and the solo part becomes ever more virtuosic. A brief passage for the violin alone opens the way for shimmering tremolandos like those with which the movement began, and what one might call this textural recapitulation introduces at last the return of the wonderful first melody, a little slower this time, played by the flute, with harp and solo violin adding delectable filigree. The last word is the flute's, a quiet run of sixty-‑fourth-‑notes curling upward like a twist of scented smoke.
Szigeti writes in his memoirs that at first sight this concerto fascinated him "by its mixture of fairy‑tale naïveté and daring savagery in lay‑out and texture." We have experienced that juxtaposition within the first movement: now it is extended in that the second movement, a scherzo marked vivacissimo, represents the “savage” element as against the generally more lyrical first and third movements. The music, full of contrast, is by turns amusing, naughty, for a while even malevolent, athletic, and always violinistically ingenious and brilliant. It seems to be over in a moment.
Against a tick-tock of clarinet and strings, the bassoon proposes the first melody of the finale and does it rather in the manner of "as I was saying. . . ." The violin extends, comments, varies. In the second theme, too, the solo violin is often commentator more than protagonist. Most of the music is generously lyrical, and the orchestral textures become ever more elaborate. As the pace becomes more tranquil, the melody that opened the first movement returns. Now it belongs both to the soloist and to the orchestra's first violins, the soloist playing it an octave higher and as a chain of trills. The glowing orchestral texture is studded with fragments of material from the third movement. The close is dreamy and at peace. Here too the flute is the last character to slip from the stage. —Michael Steinberg
Michael Steinberg, the San Francisco Symphony’s Program Annotator from 1979 to 1999 and a contributing writer to our program book until his death in 2009, was one of the nation’s pre-eminent writers on music. We are privileged to continue publishing his program notes. His books are available at the Symphony Store in Davies Symphony Hall.
Recordings: Gil Shaham with André Previn and the London Symphony Orchestra (Deutsche Grammophon) | Julia Fischer with Yakov Kreizberg and the Russian National Orchestra (Pentatone) │ Itzhak Perlman with Gennady Rozhdestvensky and the BBC Symphony Orchestra (EMI Classics)
Reading: Prokofiev: A Biography, From Russia to the West, 1891-1935, by David Nice (Yale) | Sergei Prokofiev: A Biography, by Harlow Robinson (Viking) | Selected Letters of Sergei Prokofiev, translated and edited by Robinson (Northeastern) | Sergei Prokofiev: Soviet Diary 1927 and Other Writings, translated and edited by the composer’s son Oleg Prokofiev (Faber & Faber) | Prokofiev’s Diaries, 1907-1914: Prodigious Youth, translated and annotated by Anthony Phillips (Cornell University Press)
Davies Symphony Hall
201 Van Ness Ave
San Francisco, CA 94102
Mon - Fri: 10am - 6pm
Sat: Noon - 6pm
Sun: 2 hours prior to concerts
Your gift makes concerts possible.